February 28, 2024

Healt Hid

Because health is very important to us

Exploring patient treatment decision making for osteoarthritis in the UAE: a cross-sectional adaptive choice-based conjoint study | BMC Public Health

8 min read
  • Leifer VP, Katz JN, Losina E. The burden of OA-health services and economics. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022;30(1):10–6.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahendira L, Jones C, Papachristos A, Waddell J, Rubin L. Comparative clinical and cost analysis between surgical and non-surgical intervention for knee osteoarthritis. Int Orthop. 2020;44(1):77–83.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Thysen S, Luyten FP, Lories RJU. Targets, models and challenges in osteoarthritis research. Dis Model Mech. 2015;8(1):17–30.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermann W, Lambova S, Muller-Ladner U. Current treatment options for osteoarthritis. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2018;14(2):108–16.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Saleh JA, Albelooshi AA, Salti AA, Farghaly M, Ghorab AM, Linga S, et al. Burden, treatment patterns and unmet needs of osteoarthritis in Dubai: a retrospective analysis of the Dubai Real-World Claims Database. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9(1):151–74.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross M, Smith E, Hoy D, Nolte S, Ackerman I, Fransen M, et al. The global burden of hip and knee osteoarthritis: estimates from the Global Burden of Disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1323–30.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • People-centred health care: a policy framework. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific; 2007. Accessed 11 July 2023.

  • Hiligsmann M, Pinto D, Dennison E, Al-Daghri N, Beaudart C, Branco J, Bruyère O, et al. Patients’ preferences for osteoarthritis treatment: the value of stated-preference studies. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31(1):1–3.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan PF, Strombom I. Improving health care by understanding patient preferences: the role of computer technology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(3):257–62.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennedey V, Derman SH, Hiligsmann M, Civello D, Schwalm A, Seidl A, et al. Patients’ preferences in periodontal disease treatment elicited alongside an IQWiG benefit assessment: a feasibility study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018;12:2437–47.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollin IL, Peay HL, Apkon SD, Bridges JFP. Patient-centered benefit-risk assessment in duchenne muscular dystrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2017;55(5):626–34.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • van Overbeeke E, Janssens R, Whichello C, SchölinBywall K, Sharpe J, Nikolenko N, et al. Design, conduct, and use of patient preference studies in the medical product life cycle: a multi-method study. Front Pharmacol. 2019;3(10):1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eapen V, Ghubash R. Help-seeking for mental health problems of children: preferences and attitudes in the United Arab Emirates. Psychol Rep. 2004;94(2):663–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajat C, Harrison O, Shather Z. A profile and approach to chronic disease in Abu Dhabi. Global Health. 2012;8(1):18.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Obeidat R. Decision-making preferences of Jordanian women diagnosed with breast cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(8):2281–5.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Muijsenbergh ME, Lagro-Janssen TA. Urinary incontinence in Moroccan and Turkish women: a qualitative study on impact and preferences for treatment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(533):945–9.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chachoua L, Dabbous M, François C, Dussart C, Aballéa S, Toumi M. Use of patient preference information in benefit-risk assessment, health technology assessment, and pricing and reimbursement decisions: a systematic literature review of attempts and initiatives. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020;26(7):543046.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzubaidi H, Hussein A, Namara KM, Scholl I. Psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire: the entire process from translation to validation. BMJ Open. 2019;9(4):e026672.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • AlHaqwi AI, AlDrees TM, AlRumayyan A, AlFarhan AI, Alotaibi SS, AlKhashan HI, et al. Shared clinical decision making: a Saudi Arabian perspective. SMJ. 2015;36(12):1472–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alzubaidi H, Samorinha C, Saidawi W, Hussein A, Saddik B, Scholl I. Preference for shared decision-making among Arabic-speaking people with chronic diseases: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(4):e058084.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulo MS, Loney T, Lapão LV. The primary health care in the emirate of Abu Dhabi: are they aligned with the chronic care model elements? BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):725.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alameddine M, AlGurg R, Otaki F, Alsheikh-Ali AA. Physicians’ perspective on shared decision-making in Dubai: a cross-sectional study. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1):33.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodolica V, Spraggon M, Shahid A. Strategic adaptation to environmental jolts: an analysis of corporate resilience in the property development sector in Dubai. Middle East J Manag. 2018;1(5):1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodolica V, Spraggon M. Toward patient-centered care and inclusive health-care governance: a review of patient empowerment in the UAE. Public Health. 2019;169:114–24.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Egbrink M oude, IJzerman M. The value of quantitative patient preferences in regulatory benefit-risk assessment. J Mark Access Health Policy. 2014;2. https://doi.org/10.3402/jmahp.v2.22761.

  • Al-Omari B, McMeekin P. Patients’ preferences regarding osteoarthritis medications: an adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020;22(14):2501–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham CE, Deal K, Chen Y. Adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. Patient. 2010;3(4):257–73.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers F, Sattler H. Preference measurement with conjoint analysis. Overview of state-of-the-art approaches and recent developments. NIM Mark Intell Rev. 2011;3(1):36–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand BM, Baier D. Adaptive CBC: are the benefits justifying its additional efforts compared to CBC? 2020.

  • Orme BK. Fine-tuning CBC and adaptive CBC questionnaires. Sequim: Sawtooth Software; 2009. Accessed 2009.

  • Webb EJD, Meads D, Eskyte I, King N, Dracup N, Chataway J, et al. A systematic review of discrete-choice experiments and conjoint analysis studies in people with multiple sclerosis. Patient. 2018;11(4):391–402.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu J, Goos P, Vandebroek M. Individually adapted sequential Bayesian conjoint-choice designs in the presence of consumer heterogeneity. Int J Res Mark. 2011;28(4):378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis SM, Ennis JM, Drake MA. A comparison of adaptive choice-based conjoint and choice-based conjoint to determine key choice attributes of sour cream with limited sample size. J Sens Stud. 2012;27(6):451–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumholz HM. Informed consent to promote patient-centered care. JAMA. 2010;303(12):1190–1.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omari B. Patient preferences for the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis using adaptive choice-based conjoint (ACBC) analysis: a pilot study. Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2017;5(2):220–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omari B, Sim J, Croft P, Frisher M. Generating individual patient preferences for the treatment of osteoarthritis using Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC) analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2017;4(1):167–82.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omari B, Farhat J, Shraim M. The role of web-based adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis technology in eliciting patients’ preferences for osteoarthritis treatment. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;14(20):3364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe J, Buxton M, McGarry T, Sheldon R, Chancellor J. Patients’ preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis. Rheumatology. 2004;43(3):337–45.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bekker-Grob EW, Donkers B, Jonker MF, Stolk EA. Sample size requirements for discrete-choice experiments in healthcare: a practical guide. Patient. 2015;8(5):373–84.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Omari B, McMeekin P, Bate A. Systematic review of studies using conjoint analysis techniques to investigate patients’ preferences regarding osteoarthritis treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;3(15):197–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orme BK. Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis: Strategies for Product Design and Pricing Research. 1st ed. New York: Research Publishers, LLC; 2006.

  • Al-Omari B, Sim J, Croft P, Frisher M. Patient preferences for the pharmacological treatment of osteoarthritis: a feasibility study using adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis (ACBCA). Eur J Pers Cent Healthc. 2015;3(2):253–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint (ACBC). Utah: Sawtooth Software; 2014. Accessed Feb 2014.

  • Chapman C, Alford J, Johnson C, Weidemann R, Lahav M. CBC vs. ACBC: comparing results with real product selection. Sequim: Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings; 2009. Accessed 1 Jan 2009.

  • Louviere JJ, Street D, Burgess L, Wasi N, Islam T, Marley AAJ. Modeling the choices of individual decision-makers by combining efficient choice experiment designs with extra preference information. J Choice Model. 2008;1(1):128–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toubia O, Hauser JR, Simester DI. Polyhedral methods for adaptive choice-based conjoint analysis. J Mark Res. 2004;41(1):116–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby G, Fennell G, Huber J, Eagle T, Gilbride T, Horsky D, et al. Adjusting choice models to better predict market behavior. Market Lett. 2005;16(3):197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RM, Orme BK. A new approach to adaptive CBC. In: Sawtooth software conference. 2007. p. 85.

  • Glossary of Terms, Sawtooth software. 2023. Accessed 10 July 2023.

  • Plotnikoff R, Karunamuni N, Lytvyak E, Penfold C, Schopflocher D, Imayama I, et al. Osteoarthritis prevalence and modifiable factors: a population study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):1195.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagojevic M, Jinks C, Jeffery A, Jordan KP. Risk factors for onset of osteoarthritis of the knee in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2010;18(1):24–33.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(9):769–81.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby D, Vass C, Payne K. Opening the “Black Box”: an overview of methods to investigate the decision-making process in choice-based surveys. Patient. 2020;13(1):31–41.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Alraddadi KS, Al-Adwani F, Taher ZA, Al-Mansour M, Khan M. Factors influencing patients’ preferences for their treating physician. Saudi Med J. 2020;41(8):866–73.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdem S, Thompson C. Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;28(14):360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naeem SM, Jahan F, Siddiqui MA, Khan MM. Pattern of morbidity among elders attending general practice: health needs assessment of geriatric patients in Oman. Geriatric Care. 2018. https://doi.org/10.4081/gc.2018.7774.

  • Ahmed A, Rigi A, Kokash FE, Samad OA, Shaikh RB. Arthritis among Patients Attending GMC Hospital, Ajman, UAE: A cross sectional survey. Gulf Medical University: Proceedings. 2014;5(6):52–9.

  • Al-Modeer MA, Hassanien NS, Jabloun CM. Profile of morbidity among elderly at home health care service in Southern Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 2013;20(1):53–7.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Saleh J, Sayed ME, Monsef N, Darwish E. The prevalence and the determinants of musculoskeletal diseases in Emiratis attending primary health care clinics in Dubai. Oman Med J. 2016;31(2):117–23.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson T, Ekvall Hansson E, Thorstensson CA, Eek F, Bergman P, Dahlberg LE. The effect of education and supervised exercise on physical activity, pain, quality of life and self-efficacy – an intervention study with a reference group. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19(1):198.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Chait MM. Gastroesophageal reflux disease: Important considerations for the older patients. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;2(12):388–96.

    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson JH, Callister LC, Berry JA, Dearing KA. Patient-centered care and adherence: definitions and applications to improve outcomes. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2008;20(12):600–7.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecluse LLA, TuteinNolthenius JLE, Bos JD, Spuls PI. Patient preferences and satisfaction with systemic therapies for psoriasis: an area to be explored. Br J Dermatol. 2009;160(6):1340–3.

    CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel BA, Helmes AW, Hasenburg A. Concordance between patients’ desired and actual decision-making roles in breast cancer care. Psychooncology. 2008;17(2):182–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari M, Alanazi A, Moin A. Consumers’ awareness, attitude and associated factors towards self-medication in Hail, Saudi Arabia. Bourgeois D, editor. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0232322.

    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RB, McDonald H, Garg AX, Montague P. Interventions for helping patients to follow prescriptions for medications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(2):CD000011. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000011.

  • Boye KS, Curtis SE, Lage MJ, Garcia-Perez LE. Associations between adherence and outcomes among older, type 2 diabetes patients: evidence from a Medicare Supplemental database. PPA. 2016;16(10):1573–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolson PJA, Holden MA. Patient Preferences and Osteoarthritis Care: What Do We Know About What Patients Want from Osteoarthritis Treatment? Curr Treat Options in Rheum. 2023;9:120–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivero-Santana A, Perestelo-Perez L, Perez-Ramos J, Gonzalez-Lorenzo M, Serrano-Aguilar P. Treatment Preferences in Patients with Knee or Hip Osteoarthritis: An Overview. In: Osteoarthritis – Diagnosis, Treatment and Surgery. InTech; 2012. https://doi.org/10.5772/26343.

  • Margolis SA. Patient satisfaction with primary health care services in the United Arab Emirates. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(3):241–9.

    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 

  • link

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Copyright © All rights reserved. | Newsphere by AF themes.